Product Development Research for Installation
Before you commit tooling budget to a new electrical enclosure, press fitting, or smart control, the people who will install it daily should pull it apart first. Installation products are judged in the hand, on the wall, under time pressure, and a product that adds five minutes to a standard job will be remembered for years. Development risk in this sector has a specific shape: features engineers love that installers never use, redesigns that quietly trigger brand switching, and country differences in installation practice that make one specification wrong in half your markets. Each of these is measurable before launch, not after. Our product development research covers the full arc from needs assessment through concept testing, prototype validation, pre-production checks, and post-launch evaluation. We work with HVAC installers, electricians, and plumbers by phone for concept screening and face-to-face when they need the product in their hands, so your R&D team gets a prioritised requirements list grounded in real workflow.
5
development stages covered: needs assessment through post-launch evaluation
Hands-on face-to-face prototype testing capability with installers across Europe
8 to 12
in-depth interviews per country per audience, the typical qualitative depth
20+
countries with direct phone access to installers for quantitative validation
What We Measure
Unmet Needs & Workflow Friction
What slows an installer down today: handling problems with enclosures, rework risk in fitting steps, awkward mounting positions. Current workarounds, which reveal the needs installers have stopped articulating. These define the feature list worth building, before any concept is drawn.
Concept Appeal & Relevance
Whether the concept solves a recognised problem, measured against the installer’s current solution, never in a vacuum. Purchase intent, expected use cases, and fit with existing systems and tools.
Feature Prioritisation
Must-have, differentiating, and cut-candidate features separated with trade-off methods. MaxDiff and conjoint applied so stated wishes do not inflate the specification.
Prototype Performance in Hand
Ergonomics, installation time, perceived robustness, and error-proneness. Assessed face-to-face with the physical product mounted, fitted, and stressed in realistic conditions.
Switching & Risk Effects
Whether a design change threatens loyalty: for example, if regulation forces a press indicator redesign, does that influence brand choice or trigger switching among installers. Quantified switching probability by installer type and country.
Price-Value Alignment
What the validated concept can charge, tested at the end of the development module so pricing reflects the final feature set. Van Westendorp or conjoint pricing layered onto the validation wave.
Subsectors Covered
Subsector
HVAC & Plumbing
Products must survive real installation conditions, and energy-transition products like heat pumps and hydraulic components carry country-specific configuration habits that shape requirements.
Subsector
Electrical Installation
Enclosures, cable management, wiring devices, and EV charging hardware live or die on mounting speed and error-proofing, things only hands-on testing reveals.
Subsector
Sewer & Waste Water
Long replacement cycles raise the stakes: a product that adds installation time will be remembered for decades.
Note: This is a portion of the subsectors and product categories we cover within installation research.
How Installation Product Development Research Works - Example Project
Scenario: A manufacturer of residential electrical enclosures wants installer input to steer R&D improvements in France and Sweden before the next generation goes to tooling. Design: A qualitative phase of in-depth interviews with electrical installers in both countries explores daily handling, mounting, cable management, and pain points with current enclosures. A quantitative CATI phase then validates which improvements matter most and to whom, with MaxDiff forcing prioritisation across the candidate feature list. Output: A prioritised R&D requirements list grounded in installer workflow, with country differences flagged where French and Swedish installation practice diverges, and a clear separation of must-have features from cost without preference. Note: This is an example of a typical project design, not a fixed process. Validating a roofing technology with hands-on testing, or a digital platform with facility managers, looks different.
Target Audiences
Note: Audience mix is tailored to each project. This is a portion of the audiences we cover.
HVAC Installers [CATI / face-to-face]
Daily users whose handling feedback determines whether a product saves or costs time on site.
Plumbers [CATI / face-to-face]
Critical for fittings, pipe systems, and sanitary products, where fitting feel drives loyalty.
Electrical Installers & Panel Builders [CATI / face-to-face]
The test bench for enclosures, cable management, and wiring devices.
M&E Engineers [IDI]
Reveal specification requirements a product must meet to be considered at all.
Wholesalers [CATI / IDI]
Gatekeepers whose stocking criteria decide whether the launch reaches shelves.
Facility Managers [CATI / IDI]
Relevant for digital tools and management platforms used alongside installers.
Our Advantage
Installation products are judged in the hand, on the wall, under time pressure. We run face-to-face prototype testing with phone-recruited installers across Europe, which most agencies simply cannot field. A concept that scores well in an online description and fails at first mounting is an expensive lesson we help you skip.
We know this sector’s development traps: features engineers love that installers never use, redesigns that quietly trigger brand switching, country differences in installation practice that make one spec wrong in half your markets. Our studies are built to surface exactly these risks, as in our work on press indicator redesign and switching behaviour across eight countries.
And we cover the full arc, needs assessment through post-launch, with pricing modules integrated where the feature-cost decision needs numbers. Your R&D team gets a prioritised requirements list grounded in workflow, not a satisfaction score.
Project Examples
An electrical enclosure manufacturer combined depth interviews on daily handling and pain points with a quantitative validation of improvement priorities, delivering a prioritised R&D requirements list with country differences flagged.
FR, SE
A press fitting manufacturer facing a regulation-forced press indicator redesign measured whether the change would influence brand choice or trigger switching among installers, de-risking the redesign across eight markets.
UK, FR, DE, NL, DK, SE, IT, HU
A manufacturer validated interest in a digital management platform among installers and facility managers, mapping daily workflow challenges and current tool usage to confirm product-market fit before build investment.
FR
A smart controls manufacturer prioritised room thermostat features among homeowners and tenants across three countries, feeding the development roadmap for a connected product where consumer preferences shape what installers will be asked to fit.
DE, FR, TR
Deliverables
- Product development report with concept or prototype performance versus current solutions
- Prioritised feature list split into must-have, differentiating, and cut candidates, with MaxDiff or conjoint backing
- Workflow friction map showing where the product saves or costs installer time
- Switching risk assessment where a design change touches an existing product
- Country adaptation notes flagging where installation practice requires specification variants
- Verbatim quote bank from qualitative sessions, organised by theme and country, for your R&D team
- Price-value module results aligning the final specification with a chargeable price
- Raw data file (SPSS or Excel) plus a debrief workshop with R&D and product management
-
How do you test physical products with installers?
Face-to-face hands-on sessions where installers mount, fit, and stress the prototype in realistic conditions, recruited by phone with trade screeners. Some categories only reveal their flaws in the hand.
-
What sample do we need at each stage?
Needs and concept exploration: 8 to 12 IDIs per country per audience. Quantitative concept or pre-production validation: typically 75 to 150 installers per country by phone. Hands-on prototype tests run smaller by design, focused on depth.
-
At what stage should we involve research?
Earlier than most clients do. Needs assessment before concepting prevents building features installers will not use. We then test again at prototype and pre-production, because each stage answers a different risk.
-
How do you prioritise features beyond a wish list?
MaxDiff for forced prioritisation, conjoint when feature decisions carry cost implications, and driver analysis linking features to purchase intent. Rating scales alone inflate everything to important.
-
Can you test whether a design change risks losing customers?
Yes. We have measured switching risk from a regulation-forced press indicator redesign across eight countries, quantifying which installers would reconsider brands and why.
-
Can you run development research across multiple countries?
Yes, with harmonised protocols and native-language moderation. Installation practice differs by country, so multi-country testing shows where one specification works everywhere and where you need variants. Expect 10 to 16 weeks for five to eight markets.
-
Can pricing be included in the development study?
Yes. A pricing module at the validation stage aligns the final feature set with what installers will pay, so the business case is built on the specification you actually launch.
Related Reports
Contact us
Send us a message
Please contact our office or fill in the contact form and our specialists will contact you.
PHONE
+31 10 2066900ADDRESS
Max Euwelaan 51
3062 MA Rotterdam